- CONCEPT / SUBJECT
My idea for the final is to explore the concept of showing how I see the world. Since, I’m a photographer who is visually impaired. I haven’t seen any examples through photography explaining what someone might see with my vision impairments. My vision impairments are Cortical Visual Impairment and nystagmus. I have seen examples of someone’s vision with Cataracts or Glaucoma. But I have never seen it for CVI and nystagmus. So, this is my chance to give examples through photography of what a person might see with Cortical Visual Impairment and nystagmus.
Especially during the times of the pandemic where there are so many visual cues. I have trouble seeing where, six feet part is. Also, I can’t recognize people that I know with masks on.
- TECHNICAL APPROACH (INPUT)
I’m intending to shoot my project with my 18-55 meter mm lens and 75-300 meter mm lens. I will be using a tripod. The technical concepts I will be using are depth of field, motion, color and point of view. I will be going out on cloudy days and sunny days. I will be using fast and slow shutter speeds.
- TECHNICAL APPROACH AND SPECS: (OUTPUT)
I will be keeping my photos in color. The ideal size of the prints would be 34×24 inches to 60×40 inches. Some will be horizontal and some will be portrait. I will be framing them as triptychs.
RESPONSE FROM REBECCA
Tina,
Using photography to describe your vision impairment to your viewers makes your proposed project highly personal, specific, and ambitious. The ways in which your vision are affected by (and affect your experience of) the pandemic are particularly interesting and poignant, and I wonder how these might be foregrounded in your work. I’m excited to see what you make, but I have some questions and would love a bit more information.
- How do you intend to translate Cortical Visual Impairment and nystagmus visually to viewer who doesn’t know what that looks/feels like? You talk about employing all of the basic principles of photography that we’ve studied this semester, but you don’t talk about what techniques you will use to convey this particular way of seeing photographically. Since nystagmus involves rapid eye movement, I can assume that you might use camera movement to convey this, but your proposal notes that you will use a tripod. Since one quality of CVI seems to be better vision when viewing moving objects compared to stationary objects, will you shoot moving subjects? I just read that CVI also involves better visual response for near objects vs distant objects; will much of your work focus on things that are close? Do CVI and/or nystagmus involve blurring of vision, so that you would intentionally throw things very out of focus?
- Why triptychs? How do you intend to combine the images? Is it important that they all be the same aspect ratio and fit together into an uninterrupted whole? Or would they look more like collages? How exactly do the three images in each triptych relate to each other? Through color? Content? Form? Are they shot at the same moment or in the same place?
For now, look at Uta Barth’s Field (1995-98), and Ground (1992-92) which create the “illusion of filmic space and time” through motion and intentional blurring. In Florafaunal Angiography, Dayna Bartoli, who was an ophthalmic photographer, talks about vision as both a biological and aesthetic process.
There are many artists using panoramic diptychs and triptychs, including David Hilliard and Barbara Bosworth, in New England Trail. Lucia Ganieva uses the triptych to tell a story of a particular factory through the combining of different elements associated with that place (an interior, a textile close-up, and a portrait). Claire Felicie uses triptychs to talk about the changing face and character of a person over time. Take some time to articulate how your triptychs will function and why you are making this particular choice. Consider the fact that the triptych has a long art historical lineage and is often associated with sacred or religious imagery.
-R
Tina: I’m reposting Sally’s comment here, as it was left on the general assignment page:
“I am very interested in your idea of portraying your two visual differences, the nystagmus and the cortical visual impairment. I tried to find out how it would affect your eyesight, how you would see things and really did not get much detail. Would it be like things zipping by? As artists we have the most wonderful opportunity to bring to the public, what is important, whether it be politics or social differences, diversity and health and all things that we as humans must struggle with. I can’t think of a better way to bring it all to light. I also like the triptych idea as a printmaker, there is nothing better than the impact of pairings in threes.”
Sally Dion
I like that you are shooting photos under all different conditions, very much like life in all it’s circumstances. The through thread will be how you see everything – so are you going to shoot all types of different thing also – landscapes, close items, medium shots? All different POV, or only your standing height? And why triptychs, when one could do diptychs referencing your two eyes?
Hi Tina your proposal sounds amazing and I am looking forward to it. I want to see how you “see” the world and how you will use your knowledge in photography to convey your point of view.
Hey Tina, this is a technique I haven’t seen before and I’m super excited to see what comes out of your exploration. Thinking back over the work you’ve made this semester i’m wondering if you might consider applying these effects to only part of the frame, similar to how you used your camera shot through a second camera to create a frame within a frame. Allowing the viewer to truly experience things how you see them while really driving the point home with a sharp contrast of how those without Cortical Visual Impairment and nystagmus perceive things. This technique might have to be done with some splicing in Photoshop afterwards, but I think could create some truly powerful images. You might also be able to achieve a similar effect through diptychs, two photos taken from the exact same position one with the effects applied and one without.